In 2025, the “Book Banning” issue has become increasingly more prominent, sparking heated debates about censorship, freedom of expression, and its impact on society. Books that address topics such as race, gender identity, and sexuality are often the target of these bans. This trend not only suppresses diverse perspectives, but also negatively affects many communities and individuals by limiting access to important narratives and information that could educate, spread awareness, and comfort those who face discrimination in these areas.
One notable example is the banning of Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner in various schools across the United States. The book has faced challenges due to its depiction of sexual violence and the complex portrayal of ethnic tensions. As of last year, it had been removed from many libraries in states such as Florida, Michigan, and Texas. These actions prevent students from engaging with literature that offers insights into Afghan culture and the human experience, limiting their ability to develop empathy and critical thinking skills in the youth.
The endless negative effects of book bans reach beyond the loss of individuals’ stories. They create an environment where excluded voices are silenced even more, making it difficult for underrepresented and oppressed groups to see themselves reflected in literature. Dhonielle Clayton, a bestselling author and advocate for diverse books, emphasizes the importance of the right to read. “Inclusive stories allow every child to find themselves in literature”. By ripping away our access to such stories, book bans encourage a narrow perspective on the world and deny readers the opportunity to explore cultures different than their own and different experiences.
Moreover, the book-banning trend often draws more attention to the forbidden material, sometimes even increasing interest in reading said books. This occurrence, known as the “Streisand Effect”, suggests that attempts to suppress information can backfire, leading to a greater spread of the contents. Additionally, book bans can create a soul-crushing effect on authors and publishers trying to voice their experiences. This discourages them from spreading information on important and controversial topics, leaving students uneducated about the real world. This self-censorship continues to limit the diversity of ideas available to the public.
In conclusion, the practice of banning books in 2025 poses significant threats to intellectual freedom and the enrichment of society. By limiting access to diverse perspectives, these bans eliminate personal growth, empathy, and understanding among readers. It is incredibly crucial to uphold our right to read and ensure that literature remains a space where all voices from all backgrounds can be heard and explored.
